The central government has received a new proposal to reduce the timeframe for the restoration of commuted portion of pension from 15 years to 12 years.
The Confederation of Central Government Employees and Workers, which represents about 7 lakh staff across various central departments, last week shot off a letter to Union Cabinet Secretary TV Somanathan requesting him to have a relook at the pension commutation rules, which were framed 38 years ago by amending the Rule 10A of Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981.
Confederation Secretary S B Yadav in his letter said that in comparison to the parameters prevailing earlier in the year 1986, the current parameters have undergone a drastic change especially, the interest rate, life expectancy, mortality rate, death rate, actual values and risk factor which is at just 2%.
Also Read EPFO: To what extent minimum pension under EPS is likely to be increased and by what time? Govt’s response EXPLAINER | Why informal workers can’t afford contributory pensions Pension revisions from 3rd to 7th Pay Commission: Up to 100 pc additional pension for pensioners in THESE age groups! 8th Pay Commission Delay: Employees’ Federation plans nationwide agitation in new year – Details inside
The letter also highlighted the 5th Pay Commission report and various expert bodies’ recommendations that suggested bringing down the timeframe for restoration of commuted pension to 12 years from 15 years.
The Confederation also attached a detailed note, explaining why the Supreme court judgement in Common Cause (supra) of 1986 needs a fresh look into the matter as many parameters have changed in the last 38 years.
The letter said that parameters like commutation factor, rate of interest, life expectancy, mortality rate and death rate have undergone significant changes over the last four decades.
Also read: NPS Vs OPS: ‘Going back to Old Pension Scheme a bad idea’, Montek backs Centre’s move to continue NPS
“Now that 38 years have lapsed, a fresh look into the matter is required and request your good self to re-examine the whole issue of 1986 orders,” the letter said on the Supreme Court’s 1986 order.
“Though the commutation is optional, the government being a ‘Model Employer’, should view this as a welfare and not as a profit-making measure.
» Read More
